I’d like to propose that BrightID join IFT as a provider of the basic human right to identify as an anonymous, yet unique person.
I architected BrightID as a public good with core tenets of preserving privacy, operating peer-to-peer (both on the personal level and the node level) without censorship, and self-sovereign ownership of one’s own identity. I feel that we resonate powerfully with the principles of IFT.
We need an alternative identifier for use online other than those provided by government IDs. Social security numbers being used as identifiers have created security debacles in the form of massive data leaks. The advent of ePassports help, but don’t solve the problem of centralized control leading to censorship and opaque procedures permitting internal attacks (such as bribery and sybil attacks). In addition, many people are stateless; instead of trying to fix the problem of statelessness, we should extend rights and benefits to people simply for existing.
Verification in BrightID is done by people that already know the subject person. Recovery and stewardship of a person’s unique identifier are also handled by such people, making the recovery process highly resilient in contrast to recovering from a stolen social security number or biometric scan.
Being a public good, BrightID has been chronically underfunded. This has been the primary hindrance to its adoption. Despite this, we’ve filled the Ethereum ecosystem with 100,000 verified users. I continue to devote my time and own savings to working on this difficult but important problem.
Let me also share with you the Aura app, which extends decentralized attestations to other domains. We’ve seen the mishandling and overreach recently in governments to require 18+ verification. Aura would be an elegant and non-intrusive, non-governmental solution to prove majority, as well as many other attestations in a decentralized way that relies on first-hand knowledge rather than governmental proxy agents. Aura is an open system where people with intimate knowledge validate each other and non-human subjects. Aura participants also validate contributors in Aura itself. The Aura accountability protocol is the product of years of user research and experiments in graph theory conducted in the context of actual BrightID usage.
As Aura becomes integral to BrightID, I also propose that it join the IFT as part of BrightID.
I’ve been discussing with Cyp, @roxanneen and @vpavlin how to leverage BrightID and Aura to onboard new users to Status L2 and Waku. Our goals are: fair and generous network access for new users, soulbound recovery of accounts, and defeating sybil attacks that could threaten network stability.
I think BrightID (with Aura) could do even more good under the stewardship of IFT. Let me know if you agree.
Naming
I propose the name “Aura” when joining the IFT. It fits the feeling of the other portfolio organizations with similarly short names. “Aura” can encompass both BrightID and Aura, since Aura is a generalized version of BrightID that proves all kinds of attestations in a decentralized way (not just human uniqueness).