2nd Berlin circles - 28.11.2025

On November 28, we hosted the second Berlin Circle at Holzmarkt 25, a place many Berliners regard as a grassroots counterweight to the city’s ongoing gentrification.

1. Attendees

  • Youssef
    • Software engineer at SoundCloud
    • Interested in activism and freedom of speech
  • Sergei
    • Working for Logos (formerly Waku)
    • Background in academic space, Bitcoin, Ethereum
  • Sarah
    • Co-founder of Regen Network – Edge City
    • Contributor to Network Nation
    • Leaving Berlin soon
  • Charlie
    • Working on city expansion and governance for 13–14 years
    • Involved with a Swiss association for land trust
    • Leaving Berlin soon
  • Daniel
    • Interdisciplinary researcher (PhD-level)
    • Currently working for a school
    • Project related to safe sovereignty / sovereign infrastructure
    • Not from Berlin; was visiting for this meeting
  • “Peace Pirates” circus caravan (Harmonautica)

2. Topic: Decentralised Private Communication

  • Focus on Ethereum-based decentralised communication protocols and the challenge of staying open while resisting spam.
  • Open networks must remain accessible, but spammers can easily abuse them.

Past approach:

  • Tried Whisper (Ethereum’s early messaging protocol).
  • Conclusion: not very scalable for broad use.

Current direction:

  • Moving away from a pure crypto-first framing toward messaging as a primary use case.
  • Exploring zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) as a tool for:
    • Registering membership in a network.
    • Allowing each user to send only a limited number of messages.
    • Preventing spam without collecting or exposing unnecessary personal data.
  • Key idea:
    • You can check that a user is not spamming
    • While still protecting privacy and minimizing data exposure.

3. Winnable Issues in Berlin

Discussion about focusing on concrete, “winnable” issues where technology, activism, and local organisation can realistically make a difference.

3.1 Water Activism in Berlin

  • Emphasis on drinkable water and the protection of big lakes and river systems.
  • Concerns around:
    • Impacts of coal mining and industry on water quality and quantity.
    • Practices where companies release too much water or pollutants back into sources.
  • Themes:
    • Sovereignty of rivers – treating rivers as entities or commons that need legal and social protection.
    • Supporting and connecting river groups and local environmental organisations.

3.2 Bürgergeld (Basic Income / Social Support)

  • Focus on Bürgergeld in Germany and the problem of slow bureaucracy.
  • Many people are formally entitled to receive this money, but processes can delay access.
  • Ideas discussed:
    • Use of digital identity verification and secure document uploads to:
      • Speed up identity and eligibility checks.
      • Reduce friction for applicants.
      • Ensure quicker access to essential financial support.

3.3 Kältebus

  • Kältebus: cold-weather outreach buses supporting homeless and vulnerable people in Berlin.
  • Seen as an example of practical, on-the-ground support infrastructure.
  • Potential interest in:
    • Better coordination, data, and communication tools (possibly privacy-preserving) to make such services more effective and responsive.

3.4 Housing & Privacy

  • Problem identified:
    • Prospective tenants often have to share large amounts of personal and financial data with multiple potential landlords.
  • Proposed direction:
    • Use zero-knowledge proofs to allow tenants to:
      • Prove they meet certain requirements (income level, verified identity, no major arrears, etc.)
      • Without revealing all underlying details to every landlord.
  • Goal:
    • Balance tenant privacy with landlord risk management, reducing data exposure while keeping the rental process functional.
4 Likes

Very interesting the proposal about identity and basic income. The experience of basic income in Finland did not work, I did not know Germany had one in place.